부동산경영, Vol.27 (2023)
pp.173~199
- 국민임대주택 거주자의 주거만족도를 결정하는 사회적 주거복지요인에 관한 연구 - 하남시 지역 국민임대주택 거주자를 중심으로 - -
본 연구는 주거취약층인 국민임대주택 거주자들의 주거만족도에 사회복지서비스 환경 이 영향을 미치고 있는지 여부를 검증하여, 공공임대주택 공급계획과 주거복지 서비스의 효율성을 도모하고, 주거취약계층의 주거권 보장에 기여하기 위하여 시행되었다. 연구를 위해 우선 선행연구를 조사․분석하여 연구 모형을 작성하고 3가지 가설을 설정하였으며, 하남시 소재 국민임대주택단지 거주자를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 다중회귀모형을 작성하였다. 이 모형을 근거로 가설을 검증하였으며, 검증 결과에 따른 시사점을 정리하 였다. 검증 결과 복지시설요인은 국민임대주택 거주자의 주거만족도에 정의 영향을 미칠 것 이라는 제1가설과, 복지시설요인은 국민임대주택 거주자의 추천의도에 정의 영향을 미칠 것이라는 제2가설은 채택되었다. 다만, 국민임대주택 거주자의 주거만족도 결정요인과 추천의도 결정요인은 유사할 것이라는 제3가설은 부분 채택되었다. 가설 검증 결과를 감안하여 3가지 시사점을 정리하였다. 첫째, 공공임대주택의 건설에 서 사회복지서비스와의 연계성을 더욱 강화하는 것이 바람직할 것이다. 둘째, 주거만족도 와 관련된 연구에서는 정부 주도의 주거만족도 조사로 인한 과잉 응답 가능성을 감안하여 추천의도 등 대체 변수를 채용하는 것이 바람직할 것이다. 셋째, 공적 자료를 분석할 때에 는 주거만족도에 대한 과잉 응답 가능성을 감안하여 분석하는 것이 필요할 것이다. 본 연구는 복지시설요인이 국민임대주택 거주자의 주거만족도에 상당한 영향을 미치 고 있음을 밝힌 점에서 연구의 기여도가 인정된다고 볼 수 있다. 또한 공적 자료에 과잉 주거만족도가 포함될 가능성도 밝힌 점에서도 기여도가 인정될 수 있을 것이다.
A Study on Social Housing Welfare Factors That Determine Housing Satisfaction of Residents of National Rental Housing - Focusing on Residents of National Rental Housing in Hanam City -
This study was conducted to determine whether the social welfare service environment has an impact on the housing satisfaction of residents of national rental housing, in order to promote the efficiency of the government's public rental housing supply plan and housing welfare service plan, and to contribute to the guarantee of housing rights for vulnerable populations. To conduct the study, a research model was developed based on a review and analysis of previous studies, and three hypotheses were established. A survey was conducted on residents of government-subsidized rental housing in Hanam City to develop a multiple regression model for hypothesis testing. The hypotheses were then verified based on the developed model, and implications based on the verification results were summarized. The results showed that the welfare facility factor was adopted as the first hypothesis, which stated that it would have a significant impact on the housing satisfaction of residents of government-subsidized rental housing. The second hypothesis, which stated that the welfare facility factor would affect the intention to recommend government-subsidized rental housing, was also adopted. However, the third hypothesis, which stated that the determinants of housing satisfaction and intention to recommend government-subsidized rental housing would be similar, was partially adopted. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, three implications were summarized. First, as social welfare services become more deeply involved in the daily lives of low-income residents, it is desirable to further enhance the linkage between public rental housing construction and social welfare services. Second, in housing satisfaction-related studies, it is desirable to consider the possibility of excessive response due to continued government-led housing satisfaction surveys and to consider the use of alternative variables such as willingness to recommend. Third, when analyzing public data such as the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport's housing survey data or the Seoul city public rental housing resident panel survey data, it is necessary to consider the possibility of excessive housing satisfaction responses and to conduct analysis accordingly. This study's contribution can be acknowledged in revealing that the welfare facility factor, which was overlooked in previous research, significantly affects the housing satisfaction of residents of government-subsidized rental housing. Additionally, the contribution can be acknowledged in revealing the possibility of over-response in housing satisfaction in public data that many previous studies are using.